On-demand vs. Traditional Employment

Comments ยท 80 Views

all employers are required to properly file payroll taxes for regular employees, while no such requirement applies in the case of on-demand staff.

There are two main options when filling labor needs: traditional staffing and on-demand labor. Traditional staffing is the most suitable for businesses with a definitive need for a full-time employee to maintain their baseline headcount. This option allows companies to stick to their existing workforce without increasing or decreasing it due to fluctuating demand or seasonal needs. On the other hand, on-demand labor can offer greater flexibility by letting companies flex up and down their capacity according to their requirements. It also lets them build a larger labor pool, which can be tapped into when needed to match current demand precisely.

When considering which option is best for your company, consider not only your short-term needs but any potential long-term issues that might arise. Suppose you know that you will need additional workers only in the short term. In that case, on-demand labor might be a better choice than traditional staffing as it allows you to flexibly add personnel without having to employ them permanently. However, if you require sustained staffing, traditional solutions are usually preferable as these typically provide more assurance that workers will be available when needed and with higher job quality and loyalty levels than those sourced from an on-demand platform.

More info: Observability vs Monitoring

Read more
Comments